Peace Averted; George Bush vs. Iran
It’s time to kick it up a notch in the fight to inject sanity into United States policy toward Iran. Too many anti-war activists are acting complacent about this one, and I’m not sure why. I hope it’s not because we already have our own hands full opposing Bush on Iraq, because if that’s the case we are far weaker than I want to imagine. I simply refuse to believe that we can’t walk and chew gum at the same time because… well just because.
And it would be just as disturbing to think that there still may be peace advocates who underestimate the capacity of this Administration to shout loudly AND swing a big stick, no matter how unpopular the war in Iraq is or how overextended our military might now be. We are “led” by a government that needs enemies as a rational to rule, and either by accident or design an attitude like that eventually leads to armed conflict. That attitude already torpedoed a historic chance for peace with Iran, as well as progress on a host of issues affecting the Middle East, back in May of 2003, according to this recently published column by Nicholas D. Kristof:
